Find a Lawyer

SH. KHALID MEHMOOD versus STATE

Article 25 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petition was dismissed by the petitioner from the petitioner Barilan, which was a subpoena before the Accountability Court, except that all the others were already dismissed because those provisions. The petitioner had entered into bail. After paying damages, Section 25 of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, the applicant refused to plead the case and had previously requested that there was no cause for it and there was no compelling evidence against him. Standing, the petitioner demanded an end to the proceedings against him. As a result of the transaction of 35 million and so far, there was approximately $ 41 million, which is far more than the loss to the department and the reference is mentioned in the plateau, the loss recovered by the Chairman, National Accountability Bureau. Was valid for the purposes of. The co-accused did not go to the applicant's hearing, using it to stand firm on his plea that he was innocent. Other / co-accused bargained for their positions and paid the amount, which the Department indicated, and subsequently the NAB also attributed all those who were fully paid, including the applicant, and anything. Was not saved. The purpose of the retrieval was not to punish the people only where they could be recovered and the provisions of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, and section 25, were accepted by Chairman NAB voluntarily. And at the same time his loss was good. , The matter will be over and someone will take it for granted immigration advocate from FR Peshawar lawyer