Find a Lawyer

ABDULLAH versus STATE

Definition of section 2302 (b) is not the definition of the statement of the witness named in the FIR but it was later submitted that it was rightly excluded by the complainant of the court, the other witness, There was a lot of dishonest correction in his statement at the trial. The complainant not only supported any evidence about the delay in filing the FIR, but also denied the facts; no one was present at the time of the incident and the girl, who was not before any medical aid, There was bleeding for a long time. His medical evidence does not support the version in the FIR, which was filed more than nine months after the incident by the investigating officer in connection with the Dera blood-stabbing. That the accused could not be found could be thought to have sustained the serious weapons of the crime so that he could not be presented to the police, nor could he have blood. This means that the merger did not take place during such a long period. The accused had no motive to kill. The accused was not allegedly guilty after the prosecution of the law, he could not be suspected as the accused. Was acquitted on the benefit of the doubt in the circumstances. best law firm from Usta Mohammad lawyer