Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD MUSHTAQ ALIAS BAO versus STATE

Sections 2 & 2 and evidence 32re The location of the value of the evidence and the time at which the incident took place was not challenged by all the complainant / prosecutor's witness, who was 17 years old at the time of the incident, not his presence. So the challenge was made, and neither can the complainant deny that the accused had no previous unlawful will, animosity, or enmity so that he could be included in a false case. The complainant's statement was straightforward and faith-inspiring, he said that he had taken a cross-examination and there was no stopping the authenticity of the statement. Despite a lengthy cross-examination, the prosecution's statement was fully corroborated by the witness's statement, who was the defendant's real brother. The other independent witness, a shopkeeper, also confirmed the story, acknowledging his presence in the prosecution's other witness. The chief insular account was also fully supported by the medical evidence. Delay in recording `Ferd Bian, standing altogether, explained that the prosecution's story is also serious about the facts related to the recovery of the pistol from the possession of the accused and the recovery of the weapon, as during the investigation and investigation of the case, The forensic science laboratory prosecution report showed, but an attempt was made to introduce another motive, the motive would be of no avail if the motive was proved by direct evidence and in other cases in the case. The defendant's plea for defense was simply ridiculous. The complainant himself suffered serious injuries during the incident. When hncy the prosecution had proved its case. Without a doubt, b tax advocates from Karachi lawyer