Find a Lawyer

AMIN ALI versus MUHAMMAD SHAKEEL

Section & 42 and Evac Pakistan (Administration of Equity Property) Act (7 XII of 1957), Section 10 (()) (b) Punjab Development of Damaged Areas Act (2 of 1952 of XIV), Section Su suit in which the plot. There is a declaration of entitlement to the case, including vacant property, claiming the dismissal of the lawsuit and the appeal was that the courts below were operating on the wrong legal and factual premises while deciding the matter and disputing the property in dispute. Obtained with the approval of the Federal Government for the purpose of implementing the scheme approved by the Provincial Government under Section 6. The review records of the Punjab Development of Dams Areas Act, 1952 show that the disputed property was granted immunity in favor of the plaintiffs. Under the Contracts for the Sale of Transfer of Property to the Defendants by the Rehabilitation Authority under Pakistan, there was an unlawful observation of the Property (Administration for Equity Property) Act, 1957. The appellate court, arguing that the sale agreement alone did not arise in favor of the plaintiff, unless the sale process was performed in his favor, was not appropriate because the plaintiff's father had acquired the development authority in 1964. The entire amount was paid, the execution of a sale deed was merely a ministerial function and, by no means, did the plaintiffs lose. In the disputed real estate, only the Development Authority had the right to set up such a dispute, but it did not object to the score development authority acknowledging that there was any special performance of the title in the disputed plot held by the plaintiffs. There was no need to get it. Neither sales contract nor plaintiff against the development authority law firms from Kamra lawyer