SHAHID IQBAL versus SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. SCHOOLS AND LITERACY DEPARTMENT, PESHAWAR
Article 199 Constitutional petition serious person civil service appointment applicant who came to Serial No. 156 with his session in 1998, was not appointed, while against the vacancy of available vacancies of CT Petitioner up to serial number 27 The appointment was not made. The reason is that his batch was too late to be 1998 and that his appointment would not have been possible had the candidates between 1992 and 1993 not been appointed on their turn, if they had qualified. So they will have a reason to act and complain. The batch of tests and interviews and other formal documents for appointment was very late in 1998, he had no reason to act at that time and he was not a provocative person, even if he was not available before the court. You may have been deprived of your rights because of the equality of the rights which they had acquired as a result of the judgment of the Supreme Court, which were available before the court and the judgment. It was approved in their favor, that without coming to court with only one request and no complaint, the applicant would not be entitled to take away the rights of those who were not available before the court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from Haroonabad lawyer