Find a Lawyer

BURHAN-UD-DIN versus STATE

Appeal against the Appellants of Section 417 Contempt Rule (XLV of 1860), Sections 408 and 420 Brett, who was the finance manager of a company, appealed against the trial court's decision under which the accused was convicted under Section 420. He was acquitted on the charge of fraud and breach of trust. 408, the PPC allegation against the accused was that he joined the company in the afternoon in 1969 as a job with a monthly salary of Rs 150, but he had a lot of money in the name of himself and his family. And lived in a house worth Rs 1 crore. There was high class furniture and equipment worth Rs 4 lakhs and it caused severe irregularities in purchases by overpaying. None of the witnesses stated that the accused owned or did not disclose the disproportionate wealth from known sources of income. He alleged that before and after joining the company, under these circumstances, it could not be said that he owned or owned the disproportionate property. There were no new sources of income under which it was a criminal offense for a private employee to do business, if any, of the money-paying accused, was purely urban in nature, could not be treated. Was. It has been alleged that he made purchases at prices higher than the market rate because no witness had disclosed the exact difference in prices of any two items or that the prosecution had claimed that the cash memo was fake. Were fake or careless in flight, however, could not be in line with the intention of dishonesty, if accused power of attorney advocate Samundri lawyer