Find a Lawyer

IRFANULLAH ALIAS IRFAN KHAN versus STATE

Sections 2 (b), 4, 5, 6, 7 and 12 (a) of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Section 302/324/34 Criminal Procedure (V9 1898), the age of 5 439 accused, the supervision of the trial The appointing court in which it is alleged that he is 21 and 23 years old, under the provisions of Sections 4, 5, 6 and 12 (a) of the Judicial Justice System Ordinance, proceeded in a completely different manner. I will be brought, the trial court had 2000 duty. Obtain a medical report to determine the age of the accused. In the absence of such determination, the trial will result in complications on remand of the case and the accused's case will be divided, if later It turns out that neither the accused nor any of them had attained the age of eighteen. At the date of the incident, both the accused's school leaving certificate, first fax, indicated that his age was 13 and 14 years in the date of occurrence. The age of the accused can also be verified through scientific means of further investigation. The High Court accepted the review request and set aside. In order to pass the case to the Medical Board, order the trial court with directions and then proceed with the case according to law. immigration advocates phone number from Pindi Bhattian lawyer