IMDAD ALI versus STATE
Sections 498 and 497 (2) of the Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 337F (i), 380, 452, 448, 148 and 149 before the arrest warrant the complainant, who claimed that his Claimed to be owned by, cannot submit a document to prove its claim. The accused had submitted a copy of the registered rights in 1991, showing the accused's wife as the landowner. The dispute between the parties relates to the issue of urban property related to the underlying land ownership, as the complainant himself demonstrated, that he was not living in the house at the time of the complainant's tiling, he added. After her husband's death she was transferred to another house, which was not mentioned in the FIR in the case of delay of one month in FIR and 23 days in FIR as complainant at the time of incident. The house was not located, so the question of misconduct by the accused on the day of the incident did not seem to be the case for the accused. Cushion 497 (2) was in the realm of the investigation, it was confirmed from the PC security guarantees before the arrest of the accused. Facilities \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from Sangla Hill lawyer