SHAFI MUHAMMAD versus RETURNING OFFICER, UNION COUNCIL MOLE, DISTRICT JAMSHORO
Section 152 (1) (g) Nazimab and Naib Nazim's candidates 'ability to contest the election was against the candidates because they were in public service because the teachers' candidates requested that the contract be completed in December 2004. After the termination of the job, they cannot be asked to appear in the service within six months before the nomination is submitted. Was not given, the payroll bills prepared by the District Accounts Officer suggest that the candidates paid Are drawn. In the months of December, 2004, April and May 2005, bank accounts showed that candidates withdrew salaries in May 2005, candidates had to remain in service in May 2005, thus, Nomination papers rejected \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
