Find a Lawyer

UMAR HAYAT versus MADHU LAL HUSSAIN

Article 42 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Section 42 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) change, the adoption of the final result of the facts by the courts under the plaintiff, took the stand that the lord was in the affidavit. Was the result of fraud. That it did not identify the owner at the time of verifying the disputed ation decision and that the decree passed by the appellate court in favor of the claimant was upheld by the High Court, legally the landowner's signature on the disputed mutation Were acquired with. Contrary to the provisions of section 42 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967, therefore, no reliance can be placed on this, the High Court did not take into account the material available on record. In a decision passed by the High Court, for the intervention of the Supreme Court in exercising jurisdiction under Article 185 (3) of the Constitution lawer from fb area from Sihala lawyer