Find a Lawyer

GHULAM SARWAR KHAN ABDALI AND OTHERS versus HASSAN MUHAMMAD

Section 115 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Dismissing the review for restitution of illegal prosecution Appropriate grounds The applicants sought restitution, which was dismissed by the trial court and the High Court, for the applicants. It was argued that this amendment was entered into a regular hearing. By a different High Court judge and the said judge was not available in the days when the case was settled and dismissed for prosecution. That the applicant be held to the impression that the said judge is not available and will not be revised during his absence. In addition, the applicants had taken a short decision from the lawyer who represented them in the review and the lawyer was under the impression that he was no longer his lawyer and thus he did not appear on the relevant date and such facts. Applicants were absent due to. There was nothing in the High Court Rules or in the revised note acknowledging that the review was set before the same judge, not because of deliberate but above their control, misconduct, which is contained in the Highlight Rules. The applicant, who acknowledged the review, was not subject to a misunderstanding, recognized in the law and so far about the applicant's counsel's non-submission under the impression that the petition was seized by the applicants. Is, he is no longer his lawyer, he is concerned, he was not even a proper appeal leave request excluded \ r \ n \ r \ n top advocate from South Wazirstan lawyer