Find a Lawyer

MIAN FAISAL IMRAN versus STATE

The FIR's refusal to delay filing the FIR, under Section 498 of the Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Articles 406, 408, 420, 468 and 471, explained that the defendant's lawyer argued It was not conceived up to 5406 in any way, the PPC was, in any way, arguing that the sections 408, 420, 468 and 471, PPC did not apply to the accused's case, guaranteed. It could not be considered at the stage of the case, when the accused was seeking an extraordinary discount on the pre-arrest bail, to a considerable extent the material against the accused in the form of a statement of the relevant bank manager and manager at the company. Now, before the case was reported, receipts were also available which had the signature of some of the accused persons, who was accused by the first party of their involvement in the case. While the pre-arrest bailout was unable to highlight anything specific to the privilege of extraordinary privileges, police were pointed out, which was a key component in guaranteeing pre-arrest bail from which the bail was dropped. immigration advocates contact from Shogram lawyer