AZRA PARVEEN versus STATE
No other evidence of appreciating the evidence of section 2 (2 (b)) was on record except the statement of the prosecution's witness, who was the son of the victim's body, which was recovered at the identification of the accused, who was sentenced and sentenced. No appeal was filed against him / her. His conviction was neither extra-judicial confession nor any article of any kind was recovered from the accused during the inquiry, the accused, He was arrested months later, could not be declared an accused, even though no proceedings had been initiated under the PCP against the accused. The prosecution had failed to prove the accused against any doubt beyond any doubt, and on the basis of such overwhelming evidence, the conviction and sentence of the accused cannot be retained because the source cannot be sued by unreliable sources. It was unbelievable, untrustworthy and could not be contested. The impeachment verdict was set aside and the accused acquitted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Taxila lawyer
