I.T.AS. NOS. 1721/LB, 562/LB, 260/LB, 699/LB OF 2003, DECIDED ON 16TH APRIL, 2005. versus I.T.AS. NOS. 1721/LB, 562/LB, 260/LB, 699/LB OF 2003, DECIDED ON 16TH APRIL, 2005.
Competition of defects under section 62 (1) and section 4A of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 (4A) on the basis of assessment report of the production of the account, evidence, etc., under section 62 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979. The officer who diagnosed such defects before the High Court did not identify it himself. The auditor had to face the defects in his verbal audit report which made the audit report the basis for the assessment which was a subpoena before the books of the High Court. It was examined by the auditor and not by the Assessing Officer, which is the legal requirement of the law-assessing officer, that the appellate tribunal was directed to accept the return version of the SC.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Kundina lawyer
