Sections 2?2 (b) and ????? 34 Definition of Proof The site plans prepared by Patwari and the investigating officer were silent on the identity of the accused who was allegedly guilty. Before the names of the suspects were known, the officials mentioned in the documents should mention them. The incident, according to the site's plan, took place in a densely populated area and the suspects fired several bullets, but it is common sense that neighbors It was not noticed that the police were only five kilometers away from the scene of the shooting, but none of the relatives / neighbors informed the police when the police arrived at the hospital the next day. So the possibility of registering an FIR after police consultation and consideration cannot be ruled out by the possibility that Don The alleged witnesses, who were close relatives of the victim, were residents of the Identity Parade in order to investigate the suspects with other districts in such situations to rule out the possibility of false interference, but the practice was never investigated. Was not made by the agency - The defendant's dispute with the victim in the case of settlement was not proved before the trial court as it did not provide direct evidence. The crime recovered from the scene, although the recovered pistol was matched at the defendant's request, but in light of the situation, it is likely that some of the evidence could be manipulated through prosecution. That is, it cannot even be denied. The mere evidence was not enough to convict a person of the death penalty
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
