Find a Lawyer

ISMAIL versus STATE

The case was immediately told to the police, who rejected the fictitious element by the testimony of Section 2 (b (b)). The complainant's oral testimony and his son's consistency remained intact, throughout the interim examination. No material contradictions can be brought on the record. In addition to legal and post-mortem reports through Medo Medical, recovery of blood-stained land, blood-stained, sieve and cheddar, the complainants report positive report from the forensic science laboratory. The defendant was the original nephew and there was no previous illness or rivalry between the accused and the false side lawsuit. For the complainant's judicial magistrate voluntarily endorsed the accused's confession, who appeared as the prosecutor's witness, and voluntarily confirmed that there was no material available The accused confessed to the confession or made a confessional statement. Judicial confession proved to be a crime The confessional statement provided the details of the incident provided by the accused were in dire circumstances to admit that the confession was true and voluntary. As stated, the confessional statement was not only voluntary, but also accurate and appropriate in the circumstances of the case. And was fully certified recovery. There was no reason to deny the blood stained ground, sticks, whip and medical evidence. It said that no illegal activity was committed by the magistrate while the same trial court had rendered a reasonable decision based on the correct definition of the evidence on record. Appeal could not be interfered with by High Court: Appeal was denied power, Khar immigration advocate from Kandhkot lawyer