MUHAMMAD QASIM versus STATE
In addition to the defendant's denial of section 302 bail in Section 497 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), the three accomplices were also named in the trial, but it is said that all the accomplices were released by the police, though the deadly firearm. One of the charges was made due to injury. The aforementioned co-accused were sufficiently circumstantial to assume that the inquiry was perverse and partial, that the bail application was denied and the trial court was directed to have those persons named in the FIR Yes, they should be summoned, but the police release them and proceed with them. Matter by law
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Rawalpindi lawyer
