TAHIR MEHMOOD versus STATE
Section 2 302 (b) definition of evidence, reduction of the circumstances of the conviction was the original father of the offender while the deceased was the first cousin of the accused, the prosecution witnesses testified, although he was related to the accused, but no enmity. Was not After his arrest, it was alleged that after his arrest, a blood-stained knife was recovered and his blood-stained knife was recovered, the prosecution's witness, who presented evidence of extra-judicial confession, Tell us all the details of the confession, although no witness was present in the case, but there was no reason why the prosecution's witnesses would falsely include the accused in the case, who was closely related to the accused. No question of substitution or false accusation will arise as the prosecution's witnesses were not hostile to the accused. The accused, who was not picked up before the trial, could not be brought to court at a later stage, however, the case was present because the prosecution failed to disclose the motive that was the cause of the mystery of the case. The benefit was given to the accused and his sentence was upheld, according to which his death sentence was changed to life imprisonment.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Khair Pur Mir lawyer