Find a Lawyer

SH. JAVED AHMAD versus TEHSIL NAZIM, TEHSIL MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION KOT ADDU, DISTRICT MUZZAFARGHAR

Article 199 Constitution Petition Article Article The applicant had the position of the municipal committee to collect the rights of zakat. The petitioner claimed that he had obtained the right to recover the fixed duty, which was resolved by the High Court by referring the matter to the deputy. On the basis of the petitioner's confessional statement by the district commissioner, the deputy commissioner denied Zukof's refund as the applicant had submitted that the applicant plea had claimed that the municipal committee had taken any decision in this regard. Did not The deputy commissioner had previously refused to refund the refund, while taking a decision on the reference sent by the administrator of the municipal committee, so it cannot be said that no decision had been made by the municipal committee before. had gone. The applicant was in the back and he was aware of me, since he was represented by a lawyer during the proceedings of the same law, such a decision could be presented to a competent forum under the law and he The applicant could no longer take advantage of his wrongdoing. The award was not made by the rule of the court, even in the formulation of the present constitutional petition, the applicant had hidden the facts of the decision of the deputy commissioner, such act shows that the applicant did not come to court. Hiding his clean hands and material facts, the petitioner was not entitled to any extraordinary relief while requesting constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court. advocate for immigration from Shahkot lawyer