Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

W.T.AS. NOS. 880/LB TO 882/LB OF 2004, 757/LB TO 759/LB OF 2004, DECIDED ON 28TH JUNE, 2005. versus W.T.AS. NOS. 880/LB TO 882/LB OF 2004, 757/LB TO 759/LB OF 2004, DECIDED ON 28TH JUNE, 2005.


Sections 17 and 17B Assessment of Escape of Property Wealth Tax Act, 1963 Resumption of Assessment Under Section 17B of the Assessment Officer Validity Assessment was issued a showcase notice under section 17B of the Wealth Tax Act 1963 And the inspector additional commissioner also allowed the reopening. Under section 17B of the Wealth Tax Act, 1963, the powers of the inspector of the Additional Commissioner to modify the order of the assessing tax officer may be revisited under section 17 of the Wealth Tax Act 1963. Not under this Section 17B, the super structure built on the wrong foundation had to be reopened because of the error which speaks of incompetence and the lack of information of the tax authorities concerned with handling the matter. Although the Assessing Officer had the final information to begin the investigation. Under section 17 (1) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1963, but the record shows that the notice has been issued to the assessee in this show for which the assessee has been assessed under Section 17B of the Wealth Tax Act, 1963. The officer's intention to reopen the assessment was clearly indicated and the inspection's additional commissioner declared the department's confession under section 17B of the Wealth Tax Act, 1963 invalid. The collision will not affect the assessment, based on a notice issued under the section of the law, the estimates were not convincing and the appellate tribunal did not vacate the confirmed orders by the appellate tribunal and the first appellate authority. was done. , Trying to initiate proceedings under the taxation of six canals of land under real estate tax

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocates from Sihala lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.