PUNHOON versus STATE
Section 498 Property Against Crimes (Enforcement Hodg) Ordinance (VI of 1979), Section 17 (3) Pre-arrest Guarantee, FIR was confirmed by a delay of four days for which the complainant was notified by Prima No explanation was given that it appears he committed the crime. Property offenses (Enforcement Hodgood) do not fall into the abrogation of Section 17 (3) of the Ordinance 1979, which is evident from the fact that the complainant temporarily assessed the value of the stolen property. It is likely that the accused has been named in the FIR, though he was neither an employee nor knew before the complainant's case, in which case further inquiry was sought, the accused granted pre-arrest bail. Was approved,
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Kotla Pathan lawyer
