Find a Lawyer

UMER JAN versus STATE

Appeal against the verdict of the defendants returned by the Section 417 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), sections 324 and 34 trial court was the appropriate decision, on the basis of which the appellant was apprised of the proper, fair and legal definition of the evidence on record. Failed to disclose this unknown decision. The point of being evil was fake or not based on any evidence, nor has it been proven that some material evidence was not kept by the trial court, which resulted in gross abuse of justice and all of it. The prosecution case was mysteriously revolving and there were suspicions in every case. Because of the inconsistent evidence that could not be trusted at all, the trial court had reasonable reasons for the suspect to take advantage of the suspicion and locate the acquittal, which was the victim's witness. It is not enough to prove it as a true witness, if it was not credible even by other conditions available on the recorded medical evidence, which were presented by the doctor, although it could not be considered certifiable but valid evidence in nature. False evidence was not present in the record, which was sufficient to assist the complainant and his brother on material points where otherwise the evidence on record was not credible and reliable, except the fact that the accused was a fugitive, Can't solve the pros and cons of prosecution. Sometimes, even innocent people are called by the police. Can run from fear and harassment by law to victims of violence, the reason that the fugitive may be as large as action and proof of the charge lawer from fb area from Lakki Marwat lawyer