MUMTAZ ALL, DEPUTY DISTRICT OFFICER (BUILDING) versus SECRETARY, COMMUNICATION AND WORKS DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB
Section 3 (2) of the Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), under section 3 constitutional jurisdiction, the High Court intervened in the showcase notice against the decision of the intra-court appeal single judge under which the constitutional application was partial Was granted, but the intervening constitutional petition in this case was primarily filed with the complaint that the decision in the matter of restitution and the resulting benefits was not being implemented, the High Court said. The single judge prayed and instructed the authorities to implement the decision in a letter. There was concern about refusing to interfere with the issue of issuance of the showcase notice till now. The same decision was also fully supported. Due to the verdict of the decision, there will be no complaint of the showcase notice and the employee will have to wait for the end of the proceedings. Should.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
power of attorney advocate Shahdad Kot lawyer