ABDUL REHMAN versus STATE
Section 9 (c) testimony of the witnesses, not all the civil servants, had any background of illicit will or bitterness against the accused so that they could be falsely implicated in the case, and they made permanent statements from which Confidence impressed chemical examiners. The report confirmed that the accused had been retained in a prohibited / four-charge case, the accused had already served three years imprisonment, but was paid a fine of Rs 20,000. Failing to do so, Section II was reduced to Rs 10,000 for default in payment of six months / penalty and in case of non-payment, the accused was instructed to bear a month. The appeal was dealt with in view of this situation. n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Pasroor lawyer
