Find a Lawyer

DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MULTAN versus MUHAMMAD AKRAM

Section 10 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) was presented to non-Muslim tenants in the allotment of criminal tribal scheme land, in the interest of the defendants and in the interest of the applicants for the land. After four years, the High Court decided the matter in favor of the respondents. Appeal for appeal was approved by the Supreme Court, whether under this order, as per 10 12 1968, non-Muslim tenants in the interest of the respondents had acquired the disputed land under the Criminal Tribal Scheme. Could do The scheme was accepted in 1961; whether after the High Court's decision in the first round of litigation in two constitutional petitions, the respondents succeeded in establishing their rights on the disputed land under any scheme, if so So, what effect does this have? Even if the defendants were occupying the land in dispute they can claim ownership of it under the notification dated 16 1 2002. And was the High Court justified in seeking a report from the concerned Revenue Authority to inquire whether the respondents owned the different castle numbers in another square while claiming that they were online advocate from Chitral lawyer