Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YOUNIS versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, JHELUM

OV, R 20, O IX, R 13 and Section 151 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application Ex parte rule Alternate service leave aside The contestants were absent and the former party prosecuted and the defendants. After filing a case of ex-parte evidence filed by the defendant under O IX, R 13, CPC, the petition filed by the trial court for separation of the preceding order was approved, but the trial court On appeal against the order, the Court of Appeal failed to reject the trial court's order of the plaintiff. Comply with the trial court's order on different dates wherein they were asked to enter the correct addresses of the defendants when it was not possible to issue summons / notices to the correct addresses in the absence of the defendants' correct addresses. Not only was trial court possible, service should be replaced by route. In the absence of issuing summons on the publication of announcements and receipt of their publication in the newspapers, the correct address taken in the previous proceedings was lawful. Was not, because such service was considered unclean in the eyes of the law, ignoring the provisions of the OV, R20, CPC. He was. immigration advocate from Karachi lawyer