Find a Lawyer

IBRAR HUSSAIN AND OTHERS versus STATE

Section 2302 / evidence 34 Evidence Overview The testimony of the complainant and other eyewitnesses affected by the trust were evidence of the prosecution on the time, date and location of the evidence were consistent. No dent was made in the testimony of the prosecution witnesses who died. The statement was confirmed by the medical evidence indicating the ocular testimony and the fourteen injured on the person were acquitted because five prosecutors were even acquitted by the trial court. They were suspected of involvement in the search and were confirmed by the High Court. Appeals were excluded according to the evidence available on record and not open to any exceptions. law firms from Hub Chowki lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes