Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RIAZ versus STATE

After examining the evidence in section 302 (b), the accused had abandoned his defense request and did not insist on it in his statement under section 342, CRPC if the accused maintained his defense request. If he had, he should have given his statement. The effect was that under Section 340 (2), the CCP, which he refused to make, otherwise, the defendant's request for self-defense was not available to the defendant who had no weapon when the accused. Had attacked himself with a knife-wielding knife. In the absence of any hostility to the prosecution's witnesses with the accused and there was no purpose to falsely include them in the case, no question of false accusation was raised against the same accused, destabilizing, weakening or unreasonable. The evidence, or one that is engulfed in mystery, will provide the accused with no basis to reduce his sentence, if the prosecution's case would otherwise have been proved beyond doubt by the irrefutable ocular evidence. E-Courts appreciated the evidence on record and consequently no interference was guaranteed, accordingly the appeal was dismissed. immigration advocate from Khairpur Nathan Shah lawyer