SHARAFAT KALEEM versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, BAHAWALNAGAR
Non-submission of notice to the tenant in the form given in the Schedule to Section 22 (2), 22 (6), 21 (1) and Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 199 and 10, Punjab Tenant Prize Act, 2009 ? The tenant (applicant) was presented before the Rent Tribunal with a general notice to appear and file leave and was told that the notice was set by the Punjab Rented Premises Act, 2009 as per schedule. was done. The tenant's defense was subsequently quashed and the eviction request allowed valid words, which were used in section 22 (2) of the Punjab Rented Prices Act, 2009, thereby allowing for leave. The necessary filing for the application must be contested within ten. On the day of the tenant's first appearance before the Rent Tribunal, all other liabilities and related clauses of the Punjab Rent Premises Act, 2009, when no notice was received in the form prescribed by the schedule of the Act, attached to the document Yes. Section 21 of the Act, which was granted to the tenant, at the first appearance before the filing of the eviction or before the rental tribunal. Then, the tenants cannot be burdened with the consequences of the provisions of Sections 22 (2) and 22 (6) of the Punjab Rated Premises Act, 2009 and the burden of the tenants with the said results would be in violation of Audi's rule. ? Section 21 (1) of the Act shall use the ultimatum parity word whereby the rent tribunal was required to serve the tenant with the notice in the form listed in the schedule and was asked to apply with the notice Copies and attached documents will also be included. Punjab Rated Pre
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
