MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus HAJI IJAZ AHMED
Section 13 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) denied the landlord and tenant relations between the parties, the rent controller dismissed the appeal, which was set aside by the appellate court and in the constitutional petition The court upheld it. The landlord's right to receive the rent was obliged only to the satisfaction of the court to prove that the defendants had occupied the premises because the tenant landowner had examined the applicant's author and a lawyer by the respondent. The rent note was proved, which was drafted only after consulting the landlord. No personal interest in rental matters. As the author of the application in the rental premises dismissed that the defendant knew about it because he found the execution of the lease after the appellate court again found evidence of the documents from which the landlord and the tenant relationship. Was established. Parties to finding controller errors on rent between the parties were found: The following two instant court-imposed decisions did not face any legal weakness: The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal and denied leave to appeal. \ R \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Hangu lawyer