Find a Lawyer

NASEER AHMED versus STATE

Section 302 (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 188 Rules of the Supreme Court, 1980, AXXVI, R 1 The counsel for his review of errors and commissions for the accused after the appeal has been dismissed by a reasonable and reasonable decision. Have realized And so the ridiculous premise that it was not fully heard was denied by the defense lawyer's speech in its entirety, even though the defense lawyer had left the case on merit and only on the amount of punishment he had The arguments were limited, yet the Supreme Court considered the merits of the issue of scanning the record for full justice, which appears to be unwarranted, even relevant to the decision taken by the accused on the question of the amount of punishment. Considered as a competent advocate and was rejected. The defendant tried to reopen and reopen the case, with reference to the ocular and medical evidence, as well as the quantum of punishment, but the Fourth Amendment was not permissible in the jurisdiction of the SO review, because the Supreme Court Rules of 1980 Under Rule 1 of Order XXVI, the basis for review of criminal proceedings was an error in the face of the record that could not be identified in the judgment. The pending review request is excluded accordingly pakistani advocates Quetta lawyer