RAZA MUHAMMAD ALIAS RAZOO versus STATE
In the testimony of the witnesses, there were contradictions and contradictions in the testimony of the eyewitnesses, both in the presence of eyewitnesses and the medical evidence at the time of the alleged murder, although with the prosecution case. Was supported. The way the deceased was sentenced to death, but cannot be made the basis of any sentence because it was only of contradictory value, the confessional statements of the accused, which were withdrawn, would need to be agreed with independent sources, Who was reportedly missing late in the matter. No accused was specified in the FIR for about 14 hours, in which case, they were acquitted of the charge and were ordered to be released.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Ahmadpur East lawyer