Find a Lawyer

REFERENCES BY JUDGE SPECIAL COURT-II (C.N.S.): IN THE MATTER OF versus REFERENCES BY JUDGE SPECIAL COURT-II (C.N.S.): IN THE MATTER OF

Under Section 9 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 12, 13 and 21 (g) of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance (XXII of 2000), Sections 4 and 5 provide for the minor offender on the reading of Section 21 (g) of the Counter Terrorism Act. Under the jurisdiction of the Counter-Terrorism Court Act, 1997 and section 12 of the case, it can be concluded that after the implementation of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance 2000, the Legislature felt that Omar criminals have to stand trial by the Juvenile Court under the aforesaid Ordinance 2000, and the Anti-Terrorism Court cannot prosecute them. And section 21 (g) of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 was added to fulfill the purpose of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 for the prevention of terrorism, the instant trial for sectarian violence and hate crimes. And the Anti-Terrorism Court was empowered and given jurisdiction. Trying all offenses under the aforesaid Act means the termination of the jurisdiction of all the courts, including the commissions, so that the offenders can be prosecuted in connection with the aforesaid acts. According to the law, if a juvenile has committed a crime provided under the Schedule to the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, the Anti-Terrorism Court (Special Courts) is required to conduct such juvenile trial and the Narcotic Substances Act, 1997 Will have the exclusive jurisdiction to enforce the procedure under sect. Under the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, the Control of the Narcotic Substance Act 1997 and the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance 2000, the two laws had previously been granted by the courts if they were capable of committing the crime. immigration advocates email from Naudero lawyer