Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YOUNUS versus MUHAMMAD AKRAM

Section 12 was a case of document execution for specific performance of the contract, but instead of specifically enforcing the agreement, the court ruled that the plaintiff's suit be dismissed because the order of the plaintiff's order Was challenged by the defendant claiming that the plaintiff was himself a substitute praying for a refund from him and when such claim was accepted by the courts below the plaintiff, The agreement should not be ratified in which the plaintiff plaintiff clearly performed the contract and After proving the position he was entitled to such assistance. Al Alternative Prayer for Monetary Compensation, by itself, was not a good reason for denying the specific performance of a contract and the plaintiff was entitled to an injunction for the specific performance of the contract and accordingly its claim As was prayed by the High Court, the search of the courts below was set aside lawer from fb area from Kalam lawyer