Find a Lawyer

AHMED BAKHSH ALIAS AHMAD versus SALABAT KHAN

Section 12 law exempted Article 79 suit for the specific performance of the contract to sell the evidence (10 of 1984), but allowed appeal against the expulsion, allowing for a valid dispute document containing the agreement. An unknown and significant difference between the termination and the signature of the defendant was evident in that he acknowledged it. Defendant's position is that he signed three vacancies to lease his land to the plaintiffs. But the defendants said that the fake sales contract documents were used and the two receipts were the nephew of the minor witness advocate, who produced the disputed documents in the office. And he was not a resident of the area where the disputed land was located, Syed said, the witness said his address was different from the letter stated on the receipt of the deal which only affected the authenticity of the agreement. That the stamp was meant to be used for the agreement. Without indicating that it was for sale or lease of the land, neither did the receipt of the supporting teeth in the defense case because there were modest witnesses to the receipts that they were not paid in their presence. The contents of the THI agreement revealed that the suit against the total amount was to be seized at the time of execution of the said agreement but nothing was on record. When a substantial portion of the unanimous consideration was yet to be paid to explain the cause of the seizure, the plaintiffs were unable to state that when they allegedly paid the balance amount in the receipts, they were unpaid. Were the result of regulation. Appeal Scope immigration advocate from Naudero lawyer