Find a Lawyer

SAID ALAM versus STATE

Sections 9 (c) and 25 Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), Section 103 \ Define the Punishment of Evidence, the reduction of the prosecution witnesses agreed on all the broad features of this case and their statements to record all types of truth. There is no reason to dismiss their testimony to the fact that the witnesses were government witnesses, they would not return their testimony from the credible evidence, the members of the police force were competent witnesses in the eyes of the law and called it a fact. Can be credited, unless it can be proven that they were false witnesses and involved in the culprits of an innocent person, It was alleged that he failed to state the background of any bitterness or ill-will between his and the retrieved witnesses so that it would not be credible to indicate that he was falsely implicated in such a case. Was. The police themselves placed such large quantities of prohibited quantities on the report of the Chemical Examiner in connection with the sample. The extracted substances were, in the light of positive discrimination, of a minor nature and of importance, and it was not fatal to prove the central charge of drug delivery of 10 of 103, CR. The PC was specifically excluded under the control of Narcotic Substances Control Section 25. The alliance with the general public in the restoration proceedings was not known in the prosecution case. The trial against the accused proved to be extremely reliable and logical in its entirety, not even one of the ambiguities or doubts could be convinced in the entire prosecution's version and the case while maintaining the accused's conviction. list of supreme court advocates from Ali Chak lawyer