MST. IRSHAD BIBI versus STATE
Articles 2?2 (b) and evidence // evidence evidence Definitions of evidence were already denied by the trial court for the statements of witnesses, while the three accomplices were acquitted, who allegedly committed the crime. , The present defendants were convicted only because they confessed to the prosecution's allegations in their statements under Section 234 Cr, CRPC, although they were only charged that they were The commission of the crime facilitates the accused only when the accused participant denies the evidence of the prosecution regarding the commission of the incident. The same could not be believed against the present accused, the prosecutor had to stand on his feet and beyond any doubt had to prove the case against the accused where the evidence of the prosecutor was denied, any of the accused The entry was irrelevant and could not be used. When the evidence against them was not examined as evidence of the relevant prosecutor's defense lawyer, it would not be equivalent to admission by the accused, as the trial court was bound to consider the details of the prosecution evidence. The prosecutor who failed to bring him home, who had presented him to be connected to the commission of the crime, was charged with the crime by the evidence of any evidence.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Hujra Shah Muqeem lawyer