Find a Lawyer

ABID SOHAIL versus STATE

Section 497 Contempt Rule (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 148 and 149 bail, the defendant's denial sought bail on the basis that the High Court directed the application in the previous bail to expel the trial court within the next three months. Was released. , But said the instruction was not complied with accurately. Such instructions issued by the High Court were only administrative instructions and would not give the accused any right to bail, if such instructions were not complied with by the trial court. In this case, after any unforeseen circumstances or any recent progress, the accused will be entitled to FIR bail in the present case, the case was filed with due diligence and the accused was not only specially Was named, but also had a fatal injury to the victim's forehead. The eyewitnesses involved in the FIR, who were to be thoroughly trapped, stood on their statements before police Prima, medical evidence allegedly caused the deceased's death. Injury Seat and use of the firearm were identified by it, causing injury. 12 bore guns were also recovered from the possession of the accused, of which 12 bore guns were also recovered in the FIR. The forensic science laboratory available on record has shown that the gun recovered from the crime scene recovered from the scene of the incident had been confronted by the trial court, assuring that the trial of the accused was carried out as soon as possible. It will make every effort. Under the circumstances, enter on bail famous high court advocate from Shadiwal lawyer