MUHAMMAD ASLAM ALIAS BHOOLA versus MUMTAZ HUSSAIN BABOO
Section 9 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O II, R 2 Suit To retain possession, the suit rendered a decision unanimously by the two courts, the defendant said, which had been revised against the concurrent orders in which The dispute was settled. Earlier, the case filed by the plaintiff, A II, R 2, was forbidden under the CPC Present Suit seeking possession of the suit property, due to different proceedings from the earlier suit, The current circle was not forbidden by O II, R. 2, this issue of the CPC case was properly considered by the courts on the ground that the present case could be sustained. The impeachment orders were in accordance with the record, the defendants unable to advertise any scope of error or weakness in provocative decisions, could not be interfered with by High. The court is in exercise of its amended jurisdiction
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Kohlu lawyer