Find a Lawyer

MORTAR INVESTMENTS INTL. LIMITED ICI PAKISTAN LIMITED versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

The second schedule, Part I CL 77 and 77 A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) was twice the exemption from the claim of the Income Tax for the applicant's complaint. First, under clause 77 of the Second Schedule to the Income Tax Ordinance 1979, their application was not accepted by the Central Board of Revenue and rejected by the Treasury Department, although another foreign company received similar assistance. Provided, that the act was discriminatory. Secondly, under Rule 77A of the Second Schedule to Income Tax Ordinance 1979, exemptions were available on loans that were used for industrial investment and as such investment from clause 77 of the other Schedule to Income Tax Ordinance. There was no deduction from the loans received. , 1979 indicated that the federal government may approve or reject the exemption from income tax exemption and this clause, the first fax, used for industrial investment in Pakistan or officially at the State Bank of Pakistan Expression as registered was not eligible for comment. In Schedule A 77A and it was in force of use, under the clause that the other referring company was similarly exempted, the High Court did not grant any inquiry even though such constitution in the form of a constitutional petition. There was a scope that was rejected The controversial decision matters were raised under strange facts and circumstances, there were no longer just questions of fact which were decided by the Deputy Commissioner income tax level fairly and effectively. Even after repeated inquiries before the Supreme Court, the deputy attorney general can remove the working capital divorce advocates from Kech lawyer