Find a Lawyer

ABDUL RAZAQ versus STATE

The evidence of section 302 (b) criminal code of conduct (V 1898), section 367 (5) was implemented, but from the evidence on record it can be safely concluded that the victim's violent death. At the time of the meeting, the victim's mother, who explained the incident, could not be suspected of her presence at the relevant time, the victim's mother's statement, further confirmed by other witnesses of the prosecution who arrived on the scene and the accused. The victim, the father of the accused, is the father of the accused, so it is not expected that he will expose the liar against the deceased's mother, who has no intention. Permissible did not wish or intention. In the commission of the crime, the accused cannot be falsely declared a witness of interest, simply because he was the mother of the deceased, nor can the account be dismissed as evidence, especially when his The story narrated was supported by the prosecution's witnesses, who had notified her immediately after the incident. In addition to the recovery of the pistol left by the accused and the deceased, the presence of the injured person in the house by the recovery of the leftover material at the accused further revealed that the victim's mother presented the correct incident. Was. It was alleged that after entering the house of the deceased overnight at an O clock, the victim may have been threatened by the victim at the hands of the victim, in favor of the circumstances that Let them escape with such danger. Firing at an armed person without waiting for the actual damage to their weapon or property. The accused, himself inheritance advocates near Miran Shah lawyer