Find a Lawyer

MST. BAKHAN versus AHMAD YAR

A. XLI, R 27 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Additional evidence of the fingerprint expert's notice of defendant's failure to declare the alleged sale in section 42 suit was a question of whether the defendants had sold Was marked or not. It was therefore irrelevant that the defendants neither before the appellate court nor the High Court ever agitated for additional evidence did not make any difference to the absence of the defendants. famous high court advocate from Dandot lawyer