SARDAR LIAQAT HUSSAIN versus AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR UNIVERSITY MUZAFFARABAD
RR 4 and 6 (2) of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VII of 1974), Section 44 writ petition was issued after the petitioner issued a show cause notice on the request for compulsory retirement that he was banned from the University. Had entered the registrar's office. Threatened with it, threatened and disturbed the law and order. The Syed indictment is a factual question, which requires detailed investigation and cannot be recorded without evidence, it is believed that the authorized officer was appointed by the inquiry officer or constituted an inquiry committee under him. 6 (2) Azad Jammu and Kashmir Employees (Performance and Discipline) Act 1988, but this was not done The competent officer did not record the registrar's statement with which the applicant allegedly misused the applicant. No opportunity for inquiry was provided. Circumstances were not properly made by the authorized officer, the written request was accepted and the results of the authority were announced. Without any legal authority
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
