Find a Lawyer

KHALID HUSSAIN versus STATE

Definition of sections 9 (c) and 21 evidence, in the facts and circumstances of this case, will result in a reduction of non-compliance with the procedure laid down under Section 21 of the Drug Control Act 1997, Was not fatal. The prosecution's case record did not suggest any defamation by the state witnesses in engaging the accused, nor could the accused turn his credibility on papaya straw, after extracting the opium juice. , It was purchased by Hakeem's and village entertainment companies. Since banning its use in Ayurvedic medicines, not only in Pakistan but also in neighboring countries, where there was still a sudden change in the law without any proper amendments, many haikim and apocalypse were imprisoned. ? Under Section 9 of the Control of Narcotic Substance Act 1997, the maximum sentence, which required review, was available in the trial, thus, the death sentence for the accused was reduced to life imprisonment. The CRPC was also given to the accused, according to which the penalty was reduced substantially in 5 reduction 382 b. ask a advocate free from Sanjwal lawyer