Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASIF versus STATE

Section 302 (b) of the evidence was convicted, the trial was reduced to two versions, one was presented by the accused and the other by the prosecution; both sides were lying while the parties were lying, then the court It may not have been a matter of serious and sudden provocation because it was not alleged that he had seen the two slain in a state of compromise. Missing was the real niece of the accused girl. She had left her house and if she was not available in her house on her wedding day, then the accused and her other persons were to be humiliated by presenting her with a family honor. Was not sentenced to death. The accused was retained, but his death sentence was commuted to life with the benefit of Section 382B, CR PC. advocate for immigration from Sihala lawyer