DR. QAISER RASHID versus FEDERAL SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN
Articles 3 and 10 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 175 and 1993 Judicial Review Judicial Review The appellant based in a foreign country entered into a contract with a private foreign company, which refused to issue a research experience certificate. According to the constitutional jurisdiction, the Appellate High Court directed the Foreign Ministry to try to resolve the appellant's complaint Following the settlement of the constitutional petition, the appellant filed a contempt of court petition on the basis of the authorities' direction. Not respected. The High Court had dismissed the contempt of court petition by the High Court, on the grounds that the Embassy of Pakistan is not obliged to approach a private foreign institute for the issuance of certification certificates. There is a separate High Court under 17575. The court had its jurisdiction in Panja Province b and also within the Federal Capital Territory of Islamabad, the foreign country, under the special arrangement where the institution was located, was outside the jurisdiction of the High Court, therefore, such matters. No writ can be issued in the judicial jurisdiction or jurisdiction of judicial review. The High Court was used under Article 199 of the Constitution and not any other instrument of which the High Court is a creature of the Constitution, may exercise only the powers conferred on or under the Constitution by the High Court. Refused to interfere with the decision made by. The High Court of Appeal Judge dismissed the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Kot Bunglow lawyer