Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IDREES versus STATE

The definition of evidence in Sections 6, 9 and 25 of the Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Sections 103 and 156 (1) (2) was investigated by CIA officials, not in compliance with Section 156 (1) (2), secret. Effect of PC on information, CIA officer / complainant arrested with the help of the accused / appellant who lodged an FIR in the relevant police station for the recovery of 120 kilograms of marijuana and 50 kilos of opium in his living room. But the investigation into the matter was handed over to the inspector, the CIA, who investigated the matter, recorded statements of witnesses under section 161, CCPC, and presented the challan in court, alleging Charging that he was involved in the case because of hostility from the police officers, the trial court convicted the accused and sentenced to life in prison. The investigation by the CIA police was illegal. CIA officials can investigate a case; an official investigated by the CIA under authorized authorization by a competent authority, who was not eligible to investigate the matter, would be subject to any irregularities, Not to affect the verdict The investigation by the CIA officer did not do any injustice to the accused, who had failed to raise the objection at the appropriate time, before it had to be raised. If the High Court was not charged with serious prejudice, it resulted in a false lack of justice. Again, the violation of section 156 (1) of the CCP will not fail the trial, the accused was caught red-handed while selling fours and large quantities of drugs were recovered from his room, therefore, the homeowner participated. It was neither necessary nor required by law criminal advocate from Wana lawyer