Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus STATE

Section 156 (1) (8), definition of evidence, reduction of complaints with conviction witnesses, supporting the prosecution case, was presented before the trial court under which the accused was arrested and before him. Huge quantities of gold were recovered, all witnesses said cross-examination stood and stood firm. The accused had argued that the importation of gold was free on the relevant days and that the accused, who was a gold dealer, imported gold which was allegedly recovered from his possession, however, failed to be identified. There is solid, strong, positive evidence to prove that he was a businessman in the gold business, even if it is believed that being a gold trader imports gold. But he could be accused of not smuggling gold to Pakistan. In any government policy, no one was allowed to send Jack Gold out of the country without any legal permission, with the accused almost two and a half ll away from the Indo-Pak border where the village was situated. The accused and his accomplices were arrested at around 1:30 in the morning and it was not possible to get witnesses from the public at odd hours of the night otherwise public officials, police personnel etc., like other ordinary people, were good witnesses. Until it was proven that a huge amount of gold (4500 tons) was recovered against the accused and so far exceeded the accused and his co-accused. The amount was planting. The example of Ranger officials cannot be believed that the raiding party was organized at the relevant time. divorce advocates from Khyber Agency lawyer