Find a Lawyer

SYED ZAWAR HUSSAIN SHAH versus HAIDER

Section 12 law evidence (10 of 1984), the specific performance of the contract to sell the Articles 72 and 79 sales contract, proof of the stamp salesman's involvement in the criminal case, the obtaining of signatures on the blank papers, by the defendants. The court ordered the trial to be filed in the suit but the High Court upheld the same jurisdiction in the jurisdiction of the appeal. The plaintiffs agreed to apply the agreement, which requested that their signatures and thumb impressions be obtained on blank papers. When one of the defendants was confronted about his signature, he responded. Replied. Saying that his eyesight was weak and he could not see his signature, plaintiff $ executed the legal contract as well as the plaintiff's testimony through the stamp vendor, the author of the work and the confirmation of the money witnesses. Had also proved the recovery of the amount of consideration. In a criminal case it was not enough for the stamp seller to dispose of their evidence. The plaintiffs discharged their responsibility for proof of execution of the sale and receipt agreement; therefore, this case was obtained by court or by handwriting / fingerprint specialists. Did not take into account the evidence presented by the defendants to get their signatures and thumb impressions by canceling them. In the party position and in its proper view and this was misconstrued and the judgment and decision passed by the High Court were set aside and the appeal of the trial court restoration was allowed. law websites from Risalpur lawyer