Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKRAM MALIK versus DR. GHULAM RABBANI

Article 12 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Decision making, deception and misrepresentation aside, deconstruction of the case by filing an application under section 12 (2) CPC And the order was filed to set aside. The trial court briefly dismissed the fraud and misrepresentation petition, but in the use of the amended jurisdiction the High Court remanded the case to the trial court for decision and after the recording of the evidence, section 12 (2) ) Could have been briefly excluded from the CPC. Without anything where it was generally accused of misrepresentation and fraud and prosecuted, such an application should not have been dismissed summarily dismissed and the evidence Without recording, the application was charged with misrepresentation and fraud but the trial court did not. In the light of the provisions contained in section 12 (2), CPC, the content of the application was appreciated and, in view of the circumstances of the case and the allegations made under section 12 (2), the CPC, the trial court, The petition should not have been specifically dismissed, so the High Court had exercised its discretion with justice. Interference was not guaranteed on the basis of his order as any prejudice against the applicant would have to be taken to confess his point of view and to prove his claim and to misrepresent and misrepresent the courts concerned. There will be plenty of opportunities to refuse the charge. Appeal from High Court leave to appeal list of advocates from Khanqah Dogran lawyer